In 2019, the owners of Bowie鈥檚 Freeway Airport in Prince George’s County won a controversial vote at the county council level that rezoned the land it sits on to allow for much greater density.
Similar to the neighborhoods it sits near, currently it鈥檚 zoned to allow one house for every two acres of land. The zoning change would have allowed 10 times as much density. Developers were planning to build more than 500 new town homes on the site, to go with over 100 single family homes. But now those plans are on hold.
Maryland鈥檚 Court of Special Appeals, the second highest court in the state, has overturned lower court decisions that , saying it 鈥渦nlawfully violates the uniformity requirement, and therefore is illegal and unenforceable.鈥�
For Milly Hall, who leads the group Concerned Citizens of PG County District 4 and The Surrounding Area, it brings a lot of satisfaction.
鈥淭hey literally laughed at us,鈥� said Hall, when residents promised to sue if the county approved the change.
鈥淲e like the airport; the airport can stay,鈥� Hall said. 鈥淏ut even if they didn鈥檛 stay, we still believe single-family homes are OK. We鈥檙e OK with smart growth. We鈥檙e not against growth and building. We just don鈥檛 want overgrowth.鈥�
The county has made safety improvements to Church Road, which crosses over Route 50, after several new neighborhoods were constructed. But, it鈥檚 still a two-lane, heavily wooded road.
鈥淲e have all the research. All the accidents on Church Road 鈥� because it鈥檚 not built for all this traffic,鈥� Hall said.
鈥淭heir lawyer,鈥� Hall said, 鈥渨ould always say 鈥榯he airplanes, they鈥檙e killing people and all these accidents,鈥欌�� but she pointed out that it was a car that struck and killed a teenager less than a mile north of the airport that same year.
Meanwhile, the decision from the Court of Special Appeals noted that on one hand, the airport鈥檚 owners said if they couldn鈥檛 rezone the land for greater density in order to sell to developers, they would have to increase activity at the airport, seemingly contradicting any concerns about safety.
Ruling that the rezoning was made to look like it wasn鈥檛 being done specifically for the airport, Judge Sally Adkins wrote, 鈥淣o other airport properties that could qualify under CB-17 are mentioned in the record.
鈥淭he airport owners have essentially bullied the Council by claiming that 鈥� as holders of a nonconforming, allegedly dangerous, airport 鈥� they will intensify the usage, making it more dangerous, unless the Council accords them the density of their choice.鈥�
海角精品黑料 reached out to both the owner of the airport and her lawyer on multiple occasions for comment, but there was no response. It鈥檚 not clear whether the airport will appeal the ruling to the Maryland Court of Appeals, sell the land under the terms of its original zoning or follow through on efforts to expand operations.
海角精品黑料’s Ivy Lyons contributed to this report.
