The Trump administration is following through with its artificial intelligence company Anthropic as a supply chain risk in an unprecedented move that could force other government contractors to stop using the AI chatbot Claude.
The Pentagon said in a statement Thursday that it has 鈥渙fficially informed Anthropic leadership the company and its products are deemed a supply chain risk, effective immediately.鈥�
The decision appeared to shut down the opportunity for further negotiation with Anthropic, nearly a week after President Donald Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth accused the company of endangering national security.
Trump and Hegseth announced a last Friday, on the eve of , after Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei refused to back down over concerns the company鈥檚 products could be used for mass surveillance of Americans or autonomous weapons.
Amodei said in a Thursday that 鈥渨e do not believe this action is legally sound, and we see no choice but to challenge it in court.鈥�
The Pentagon statement said, “this has been about one fundamental principle: the military being able to use technology for all lawful purposes. The military will not allow a vendor to insert itself into the chain of command by restricting the lawful use of a critical capability and put our warfighters at risk.鈥�
Amodei countered that the narrow exceptions Anthropic sought to limit surveillance and autonomous weapons 鈥渞elate to high-level usage areas, and not operational decision-making.鈥�
He said there were 鈥減roductive conversations鈥� with the Pentagon in recent days over whether it or establish a 鈥渟mooth transition鈥� if no agreement was reached. Trump gave the military six months to phase out Claude, which is already widely embedded in military and national security platforms. Amodei said it鈥檚 a priority to make sure warfighters won鈥檛 be 鈥渄eprived of important tools in the middle of major combat operations.鈥�
Some military contractors were already cutting ties with Anthropic, a rising star in the tech industry that sells Claude to a variety of businesses and government agencies. Lockheed Martin said it will 鈥渇ollow the President鈥檚 and the Department of War鈥檚 direction鈥� and look to other providers of large language models.
鈥淲e expect minimal impacts as Lockheed Martin is not dependent on any single LLM vendor for any portion of our work,鈥� the company said.
How the Defense Department will interpret the scope of the risk designation is unclear. Amodei said a notification Anthropic received from the Pentagon on Wednesday shows it only applies to Claude’s use by customers as a 鈥渄irect part of鈥� their military contracts.
Microsoft said its lawyers studied the rule and the company 鈥渃an continue to work with Anthropic on non-defense related projects.鈥�
Pentagon draws criticism for its decision
The Pentagon’s decision to apply a rule designed to address supply threats posed by foreign adversaries was met with broad criticism. Federal codes have defined supply chain risk as a 鈥渞isk that an adversary may sabotage, maliciously introduce unwanted function, or otherwise subvert鈥� a system in order to disrupt, degrade or spy on it.
U.S. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, a New York Democrat and member of the Senate Armed Services Committee and Senate Intelligence Committee, called it 鈥渁 dangerous misuse of a tool meant to address adversary-controlled technology.鈥�
鈥淭his reckless action is shortsighted, self-destructive, and a gift to our adversaries,鈥� she said in a written statement Thursday.
Neil Chilson, a Republican former chief technologist for the Federal Trade Commission who now leads AI policy at the Abundance Institute, said the decision looks like 鈥渕assive overreach that would hurt both the U.S. AI sector and the military鈥檚 ability to acquire the best technology for the U.S. warfighter.鈥�
Earlier in the day, a group of former defense and national security officials sent a letter to U.S. lawmakers expressing 鈥渟erious concern鈥� about the designation.
鈥淭he use of this authority against a domestic American company is a profound departure from its intended purpose and sets a dangerous precedent,鈥� said the letter from former officials and policy experts, including former CIA director Michael Hayden and retired Air Force, Army and Navy leaders.
They added that such a designation is meant to 鈥減rotect the United States from infiltration by foreign adversaries 鈥� from companies beholden to Beijing or Moscow, not from American innovators operating transparently under the rule of law. Applying this tool to penalize a U.S. firm for declining to remove safeguards against mass domestic surveillance and fully autonomous weapons is a category error with consequences that extend far beyond this dispute.鈥�
Anthropic sees boost in consumer downloads
While losing big partnerships with defense contractors, Anthropic experienced a surge of consumer downloads over the past week due to people siding with its moral stance. More than a million people signed up for Claude each day this week, the company said, lifting it past OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Google’s Gemini as the top AI app in more than 20 countries in Apple’s app store.
The dispute with the Pentagon has also further deepened Anthropic’s bitter rivalry with OpenAI that started when ex-OpenAI leaders, including Amodei, started Anthropic in 2021.
Hours after the Pentagon punished Anthropic last Friday, OpenAI announced a deal to effectively replace Anthropic with ChatGPT in classified military environments.
OpenAI said it sought similar protections against domestic surveillance and fully autonomous weapons but later had to amend its agreements, leading CEO Sam Altman to say he shouldn’t have rushed a deal that 鈥渓ooked opportunistic and sloppy.鈥�
Amodei also expressed regret about his own part in that 鈥渄ifficult day for the company,鈥� saying Thursday he wanted to 鈥渄irectly apologize鈥� for an internal note he sent to Anthropic staff that attacked OpenAI’s behavior and suggested Anthropic was being punished for not giving 鈥漝ictator-like praise” to Trump.
Copyright © 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, written or redistributed.
