WASHINGTON (AP) 鈥� The Justice Department has issued new subpoenas in a into of President Donald Trump and the U.S. government’s response to , according to multiple people familiar with the matter.
An initial wave of subpoenas in November asked recipients for documents related to the preparation of a U.S. intelligence community assessment that detailed a sweeping, multiprong effort by Moscow to help Trump defeat Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election.
Though the first subpoenas requested documents from the months surrounding the January 2017 publication of the Obama administration intelligence assessment, the latest subpoenas seek any records from the years since then, said the people, who spoke on condition of anonymity to The Associated Press to discuss a nonpublic demand from investigators.
The Justice Department declined to comment Tuesday.
The subpoenas represent continued investigative activity in one of several criminal inquiries the Justice Department has undertaken into Trump’s political opponents. An array of former intelligence and law enforcement officials have received subpoenas and lawyers for former CIA Director John Brennan, who helped oversee the drafting of the assessment, but have not been told of any 鈥渓egally justifiable basis for undertaking this investigation.鈥�
published in the final days of the Obama administration, found that Russia had developed a 鈥渃lear preference鈥� for Trump in the 2016 election and that Russian President Vladimir Putin had ordered an influence campaign with goals of undermining confidence in American democracy and harming Clinton’s chance for victory.
That conclusion 鈥� and a related investigation into with Russia to sway the outcome of the election 鈥� have long been among the Republican president’s chief grievances, and he has vowed retribution against the government officials involved in the inquiries. Former FBI Director James Comey was indicted by the Trump administration Justice Department last year on false statement and obstruction charges,
Multiple government reports, including bipartisan congressional reviews and a criminal investigation by , have found that Russia interfered in Trump鈥檚 favor through a hack-and-leak operation of Democratic emails as well as a covert social media campaign aimed at sowing discord and swaying American public opinion. Mueller鈥檚 report found that the Trump campaign actively welcomed the Russian help, but it did not establish that Russian operatives and Trump or his associates conspired to tip the election in his favor.
The Trump administration has freshly scrutinized the intelligence community assessment in part because a classified version of it incorporated in its annex a summary of the 鈥淪teele dossier,鈥� that was assembled by former British spy Christopher Steele and was provided to the FBI. That research into Trump鈥檚 potential links to Russia included uncorroborated rumors and salacious gossip, and Trump has long held up its weaknesses in an effort to discredit the entire Russia investigation.
The investigation in Florida appears to be part of a broader administration effort to revisit years-old findings and decisions from the Russia investigation.
released last July by current Director John Ratcliffe did not refute the conclusion of Russian election interference but found 鈥渕ultiple procedural anomalies鈥� in the intelligence community assessment and chided Brennan for the fact that the classified version referenced the Steele dossier.
Brennan testified to Congress, and also wrote in his memoir, that he was opposed to including information from the dossier in the intelligence assessment since neither its substance nor sources had been validated, and he has said the dossier did not inform the judgments of the assessment. He maintains the FBI pushed for its inclusion.
The new CIA review sought to cast Brennan鈥檚 views in a different light, asserting that he 鈥渟howed a preference for narrative consistency over analytical soundness鈥� and brushed aside concerns over the dossier because he believed it conformed 鈥渨ith existing theories.鈥� It quotes him, without context, as having stated in writing that 鈥渕y bottomline is that I believe that the information warrants inclusion in the report.鈥�
It is unclear whether the investigation in Florida will result in any criminal charges.
In a letter last December addressed to the chief judge of the Southern District of Florida, Brennan’s lawyers challenged the underpinnings of the investigation, questioning what basis prosecutors had for opening the inquiry in the state and saying they had received no clarity from prosecutors about what potential crimes were even being investigated.
鈥淲hile it is mystifying how the prosecutors could possibly believe there is any legally justifiable basis for undertaking this investigation, they have done nothing to explain that mystery,鈥� the lawyers wrote, describing the investigation as 鈥渕anufactured.鈥�
____
Associated Press writer Alanna Durkin Richer contributed to this report.
Copyright © 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, written or redistributed.
