海角精品黑料

Hogan vetoes target transit spending, collective bargaining, COVID oversight and more

This article was republished with permission from 海角精品黑料’s news partners at .聽Sign up for today.

This article was written by 海角精品黑料鈥檚 news partners at聽聽and republished with permission.聽Sign up for聽听迟辞诲补测.

Gov. Lawrence J. Hogan Jr. (R) vetoed several more pieces of legislation Friday, targeting bills that would have expanded workers鈥 rights, bolstered public transit, permitted local governments to raise taxes, and allowed some teachers to continue teaching remotely in the upcoming school year.

With Saturday鈥檚 deadline looming for Hogan to take action on legislation that the General Assembly moved in its 2021 session, the governor weighed in on hundreds of bills Friday, vetoing 19 measures and allowing hundreds of others to become law without his signature.

贬辞驳补苍听聽on Wednesday, and聽聽earlier in the month. Lawmakers overrode 40 Hogan vetoes from the 2020 and 2021 legislative sessions while this year鈥檚 session was taking place and will undoubtedly take up his latest round of vetoes when they next reconvene.

In a statement Friday, Senate President Bill Ferguson (D-Baltimore City) said he was 鈥渟tartled鈥 by the number of vetoes, which, he said, included 鈥渓egislation to help Marylanders fight the COVID pandemic, strengthen Maryland鈥檚 transportation system, protect the rights of our working families, and so much more.鈥

Hogan鈥檚 office on Friday spotlighted his veto of聽, a measure from Del. Alonzo T. Washington (D-Prince George鈥檚) that would allow school personnel to continue to teach remotely during the 2021-2022 school year under certain circumstances. Hogan, who has frequently clashed with teachers鈥 unions, has insisted that school districts return to full-on classroom instruction as quickly as possible.

鈥淎s we move forward in our recovery, we must do everything in our power to keep Maryland students healthy, safe, and learning. We cannot create additional barriers, which would only lead to further confusion with limited time left in the school year. Our students deserve better,鈥 Hogan wrote in聽聽to Ferguson and House Speaker Adrienne A. Jones (D-Baltimore County) explaining his veto.

Hogan also vetoed three bills that he said could lead to higher taxes — , from Sen. James C. Rosapepe (D-Prince George鈥檚) and Del. Julie Palakovich Carr (D-Montgomery), which would allow local governments to raise taxes on certain individuals;聽, sponsored by Del. J. Sandra Bartlett (D-Anne Arundel), which would allow Anne Arundel County to increase the transfer tax on certain real estate transactions and use the extra revenue for affordable housing programs; and聽, a bill from House Majority Leader Eric G. Luedtke (D-Montgomery) repealing the sunset date of a sales tax on car sharing services.

鈥淎s we begin our road to recovery, it would be unconscionable to raise taxes on our citizens and job creators at this critical time,鈥 Hogan wrote in his veto聽.

The Maryland Fair Funding Coalition countered with a statement that said that by vetoing the bill giving local governments more flexibility to raise taxes, Hogan 鈥渉as made it clear that he supports taxes that place a heavier burden on lower-income and middle-class families.鈥

The governor also vetoed a bill that had been seven years in the making — , from Sen. Guy J. Guzzone (D-Howard) and Del. Keith Haynes (D-Baltimore City) — which would extend collective bargaining rights to workers at the state鈥檚 community colleges.

Hogan also vetoed two other collective bargaining measures — , from Sen. Benjamin F. Kramer (D-Montgomery), which would have expanded collective bargaining rights on University System of Maryland campuses, and聽, from Sen. Craig J. Zucker (D-Montgomery) and Del. Tony Bridges (D-Baltimore City), another higher education collective bargaining measure. The governor聽聽these bills 鈥渟eek to address problems that do not exist and change labor practices that have existed for decades.鈥

Hogan also vetoed bills designed to bolster public transit in the state, including聽聽a measure from state Sen. Cory V. McCray (D-Baltimore City) and Del. Brooke E. Lierman (D-Baltimore City) to help the state catch up on its transit maintenance backlog, and聽, from Rosapepe, which would require the state to begin marketing the Purple Line light rail project in Prince George鈥檚 and Montgomery counties. Hogan said both bills would have limited the state鈥檚 budget flexibility.

The McCray-Lierman legislation was a major priority of Baltimore-area leaders, still smarting from Hogan鈥檚 decision to cancel funding for the proposed Red Line project in 2015, and transit advocates and environmentalists were incredulous Friday.

鈥淕ov. Hogan is out of step with what Marylanders in the 21st century need,鈥 said Josh Tulkin, director of the Maryland Sierra Club. 鈥淭his legislation would help Marylanders have better access to safe and reliable transit and reduce climate pollution. We call on the General Assembly to override his veto as soon as they are in session.鈥

Hogan also vetoed聽, co-sponsored by the Montgomery County and Prince George鈥檚 County delegations, which would expand upon the application process government agencies have to go through to build public projects in the region.

Agencies would be required to submit complete, explanatory reports and architectural drawings to the Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission (M-NCPPC) when proposing public projects. The M-NCPPC would then have three days to accept submissions or provide the organization with an explanation of why it is considered incomplete. The organizations would then have the opportunity to amend and resubmit their plans.

鈥淗ouse Bill 464 jeopardizes economic development in Montgomery and Prince George鈥檚 counties by delaying critical projects through a unique and subjective set of processes and approvals not followed in other parts of the State or region,鈥 贬辞驳补苍听聽in his veto letter.

Another Hogan veto was of a measure sponsored by Del. Jessica Feldmark (D-Howard),聽聽which would alter the criteria that establishes what constitutes a qualified position and revitalization area under the Job Creation Tax Credit program. Under the bill, a qualified position would have set standards for employee pay rates, have career advancement training requirements and paid leave, allow for collective bargaining and guarantee workers鈥 compensation, health and retirement benefits.

Additionally, the definition of a revitalization area would be expanded to include Tier 1 counties.

Hogan said that the legislation would 鈥渄efeat [the] purpose鈥 of the Job Creation Tax Credit.

鈥淲e need to support Maryland鈥檚 job creators, not impose burdensome restrictions on successful incentive programs that bring economic growth to our state,鈥 he聽.

Hogan also vetoed measures requiring more planning for the state鈥檚 COVID-19 response and more oversight of state government emergency procurement decisions 鈥 an issue that has become especially relevant during the pandemic. A measure protecting commercial tenants from certain liabilities during the first six months of the pandemic also hit the cutting room floor.

In addition, Hogan vetoed clean energy measures and bills dealing with utility regulation.

Click here for a聽.

Click here for聽聽he allowed to become law without his signature.

Click here for聽聽he allowed to become law without his signature.

Check back with Maryland Matters for more coverage and analysis.

jkurtz@marylandmatters.org

Federal News Network Logo
Log in to your 海角精品黑料 account for notifications and alerts customized for you.