This article was republished with permission from 海角精品黑料’s news partners at .聽Sign up for today.
This content was republished with permission from 海角精品黑料鈥檚 news partners at Maryland Matters. Sign up for today.
Amid a contract dispute involving the Purple Line that a leading lawmaker described as 鈥渧ery serious,鈥� key members of the General Assembly served notice on Monday that they intend to exercise rigorous oversight over the Hogan administration鈥檚 plan to add express toll lanes to the Capital Beltway and Interstate 270.
In a lengthy letter to Transportation Secretary Greg Slater, the legislators demanded a detailed history of the four firms that have expressed interest in bidding for the $9 billion to $11 billion contract, their track record on big-ticket projects around the globe, and how they would handle disputes with the state or their contractors.
The lawmakers鈥� request comes as a dispute between Purple Line Transit Partners and its contractors, Purple Line Transit Constructors, threatens to halt the project mid-stream.
The companies are working on a 16-mile, $2 billion light rail link connecting New Carrollton and Bethesda that is supposed to begin partial operation next year.
In 2017 Gov. Lawrence J. Hogan Jr. (R) announced plans to create a public-private partnership similar to the Purple Line to add variable toll lanes to three congested highways in the Washington, D.C., suburbs 鈥撯�� I-495, I-270 and the Baltimore-Washington Parkway.
Now whittled to two roads, the project is the governor鈥檚 top transportation priority for his second term.
Del. Marc Korman (D-Montgomery), the chairman of the House Appropriations Committee鈥檚 Transportation & Environment panel and one of the authors of the letter, noted that Maryland has only had two P3 projects since it passed special legislation a decade ago.
鈥淭he first one was the Purple Line, where there was a lot of trust. The second one is this [highway] project, where it鈥檚 going to have to be trust but verify,鈥� he said in an interview. 鈥淲e definitely can鈥檛 find ourselves in a similar situation in seven years with this project.鈥�
In the letter to Slater, lawmakers seek a raft of information:
- A listing of every project in which the firms expressed interest or were awarded the work
- How they deal with requests for information from legislators and auditors, and how they intend to engage with communities impacted by the highway project
- How the firms dealt with disputes over the relocation of utility infrastructure
- How potential private-sector designers of the toll lanes intend to manage impacts on surrounding roads
- How potential contractors made good on promises to maintain existing 鈥渇ree鈥� lanes
- Whether previous P3 projects built by the potential Maryland bidders allowed free access to mass transit vehicles
- What recourse debt-holders had on other projects the firms were involved in
In a statement provided to Maryland Matters on Monday night, Slater said MDOT is reviewing the letter.
鈥淎lthough we are not ready to provide detailed responses quite yet, it鈥檚 important to note two important components,鈥� he wrote.
鈥淭he P3 method of delivery for the highway project is structurally different than the P3 structure used for the Purple Line project. Since we are in an open procurement, any responses will have to work their way through a legal review as to not impact the competitive nature. I look forward to sharing those details with the House committee leadership in our response.鈥�
In addition to Korman, the letter was signed by Del. Kumar P. Barve (D-Montgomery), chairman of the House Environment and Transportation Committee; Del. Maggie L. McIntosh (D-Baltimore City), chairwoman of the House Appropriations Committee; and Del. David Fraser-Hidalgo (D-Montgomery), chairman of the Motor Vehicle & Transportation Subcommittee.
Korman said it鈥檚 particularly important how the firms expressing interest in the express toll lane project in Maryland 鈥� Accelerate Maryland Partners; Itinera Infrastructure & Concessions, on behalf of Accelerate MarylandExpress Partners; Cintra Global, Meridiam Capital Express and John Laing Investments Limited, on behalf of Capital Express Mobility Partners; and ACS Infrastructure Development, on behalf of Potomac Mobility Group 鈥� would resolve disputes.
鈥淪ometimes P3鈥檚 work, some times they don鈥檛,鈥� Korman said. 鈥淎nd we need to see how these players have acted in other situations.鈥�
Although Saturday was the deadline for resolving the Purple Line stalemate, he said it鈥檚 unclear where things stand.
鈥淢DOT hasn鈥檛 said anything and Purple Line Transit Partners hasn鈥檛 said anything. So they鈥檙e not even sharing basic information about this multi-billion dollar mega-project that may be in the process of crumbling,鈥� Korman said.
鈥淭he fact they feel no need to communicate with the public鈥� is just a terrible way to do business.鈥�
