WASHINGTON — She’s known for romantic comedies,Ìýwooing James Marsden in “27 Dresses,” Seth Rogen in “Knocked Up” and Gerard Butler in “The Ugly Truth.”
This weekend, Katherine HeiglÌýshows her cold, creepy side in the new thriller “Unforgettable,” which never quite lives up to its title, but might offerÌýenoughÌýmoments of delicious danger for a date night.
Set in San Francisco, the film follows equestrian Tessa Connover (Katherine Heigl),Ìýwho just can’t get over her ex-husband David (Geoff Stults)Ìýafter their infidelity-fueled divorce. She’s now jealous over David’s new fiancee Julia Banks (Rosario Dawson), who’s overcoming an abusive past of her own.
At first, Julia offers an olive branch, as the two try to smooth over their differences for the sake of David and Tessa’s daughter Lily (Isabella Kai Rice). But asÌýTessa increasinglyÌýstops by the houseÌýto offer parenting advice, Julia fearsÌýthat Tessa is becoming an obsessive — even violent — stalker.
After decades of romantic comedies and an Emmy for TV’s “Grey’s Anatomy,” Heigl deserves credit for at least showing a different side, taking the risk of playing against type as a dangerous, icy blonde. She plays Tessa for all she’s worth, coming across as genuinely disturbing in her more subtle glances, then descending into over-the-top moments whereÌýshe could have dialed back on the diabolical.
It’s actually Dawson who carries the movie, provingÌýthat sheÌýdeserves more leading roles. We’ve seen her star gradually rise with supporting parts in “Alexander,” “25th Hour,” “Sin City,” “Rent,” “Death Proof,” “Seven Pounds” and “Unstoppable,” but “Unforgettable” shows she can strap a movie on her shoulders and carry it to the finish line, even if it means getting scratched and clawed in a cat fight.
Refereeing these clashes is fresh filmmaker Denise Di Novi, who makes her directorial debut after decades as a Hollywood producer, fromÌýMichael Lehmann’s “Heathers” (1988)ÌýtoÌýTim Burton’s “Edward Scissorhands” (1990), “The Nightmare Before Christmas” (1993) and “Ed Wood” (1994).Ìý
As a director, Di Novi deliversÌýa few admirable touches: an ominousÌýknife slices through Julia’s name on a cake, double and triple mirror reflections symbolize cross-generational pressureÌýfrom Tessa’s equally controlling mother (Cheryl Ladd), and recurring hallucination sequencesÌýinvolvingÌýJulia’s ex-boyfriend (Simon Kassianides)Ìýuse shadowy interiors and well-timed cuts for jolting jump scares.
But while the premise has potential for a digital-age “Fatal Attraction” (1987), theÌýscript doesn’t give its characters much credit. SomeÌýcritics callÌýthis sexist exploitation of the “Psycho Barbie” variety, but it’s hard to make that charge when the movie is directed and co-written by two independent women executing their vision on screen. Still, it’s a bit odd when a few minor scratches to theÌýface will cause the villain to give up purely over vanity reasons. What’s the message here? Stay pretty or die?
³§³¦°ù±ð±ð²Ô·É°ù¾±³Ù±ð°ù²õÌýChristina Hodson (“Shut In”) andÌýDavid Leslie Johnson (“Orphan”) are better than this. In fact, they open with a promisingÌýframing device of Julia being interrogated by police. This seems like an engrossing window into the story — especially with Robert WisdomÌýcast as the interrogator, bringing his Lt. Colvin cred from “The Wire” — butÌýwe don’t cut back to it enough for it to be effective.
From here, theÌýplot points feel awfully convenient, particularly Julia’s lack of a Facebook account, allowing Tessa to create a phony page. This could have worked under any other scenario, but it doesn’t make sense considering Julia’s recent job was editingÌýanÌýonlineÌýpublication. You can either keep the professional backstory or keep the creepy Facebook plot device, but you can’t have both.
If that sounds like nitpicking, there are larger problems with the presentation, as the script devolves intoÌýheavy-handed cliches down the stretch. During the climax, the protagonist makes an especially dumb decision to make a noisy phone call from inside the killer’s house,Ìýinstead of either leaving to call 911 or actually sneaking up on the villain to deliver aÌýsneak attack that she doesn’t see coming.
More disappointingly, we get the horror trope where the hero once again fails to deliver the death blowÌýwhen she has the villain down for the count. We just knowÌýthe monster is going to come roaring back to lifeÌýfor one final scare. Didn’t we learn something fromÌýWes Craven’s horror satire “Scream?”
By the end, the movie drewÌýunintended laughter from the audience, who couldn’t take it seriously but was nevertheless having a good time. Indeed, there’s aÌýcertain campy pleasure in the communal experience of a crowd yelling at the movie screen together. In this light, the villain’s ultimate demise is a riot — like the cork-screw in “The Girl on the Train” — asÌýis the finalÌýsurprise during the resolution.
Still, afterÌýseeing aÌýmasterful gem like Jordan Peele’s “Get Out” (2017) earlier this spring, thisÌýthriller feels like a fun but cheap movie of the week. In other words, “Unforgettable” is rather forgettable.

